Crypto Token & Coin Directory (2026)

Every asset here is scored out of 100 on the six things that actually decide whether it survives: track record, tokenomics, transparency, decentralisation, adoption and liquidity. No prices, no market caps and no affiliate links. Of the 821 assets listed, 347 return real revenue to holders through fee sharing, buybacks or burns, and the rest do not, which is the single most useful filter on this page.

0 shown

Answers to the questions people actually ask

Each of these is a filter over the same data with the reasoning written out, so you can see exactly why an asset qualified rather than taking a list on trust.

Browse by sector

Comparing a memecoin against a stablecoin tells you nothing. These pages rank only assets doing the same job, which is the comparison that actually matters.

What the six scores mean

track record (20 points)

How long it has operated, whether it has survived a full bear market, and whether it has ever stopped working. Time under real conditions is the single strongest signal available and the hardest to fake.

tokenomics (20 points)

Supply schedule, unlock overhang, emission rate, and whether the token captures any of the value the protocol creates. This is where most money is lost and where almost nobody looks.

transparency (15 points)

Verified contract, published audits, a named or long lived pseudonymous team, real documentation, and honest communication about failures.

decentralisation (15 points)

Holder concentration, who holds admin and upgrade keys, how many independent validators or signers exist, and whether one decision by one party is your risk.

adoption (15 points)

Whether real people use it repeatedly when nobody is paying them to. Integrations by other protocols count for more than user counts.

liquidity (15 points)

Where it trades, how deep the book is, and whether you could realistically exit a position. A valuation you cannot realise is not a valuation.

What this directory cannot tell you

It cannot tell you what anything is worth, and it does not try to. A high score means an asset is structurally sound: it has operated for a long time, its supply is predictable, control is distributed and it captures value from real usage. A structurally sound asset can still fall ninety percent, and a badly structured one can rise. What the score does is separate the assets where you are taking a market risk from the ones where you are also taking a structural risk on top of it.

Scores were last reviewed on 2026-08-21. Supply schedules, governance arrangements and incident histories change, so check the project's own documentation before acting on anything here.