HomeCryptoTokensLayer 1 › VET

VeChain (VET): tokenomics, risks and score

68/100SCORE · CMixed record Grade C, fair

An enterprise chain focused on supply chain tracking and sustainability reporting, using a two token model where holding one token generates the other to pay fees.

What VeChain is, and what it does

This is a base blockchain. It runs and secures its own network, and its token is what you pay to use that network and what secures it.

What the VET token itself does: Holding VET generates VTHO over time, and VTHO pays transaction fees. This insulates enterprise users from fee token price volatility, which is a sensible design for corporate adoption.

Where it runs: VeChainThor. Mechanism: Proof of authority with authority masternodes. It has been running since 2018, so roughly 8 years.

The facts

TICKER
VET
SECTOR
Layer 1
CHAIN
VeChainThor
LAUNCHED
2018, so around 8 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Proof of authority with authority masternodes
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
86.7 billion
VALUE CAPTURE
Staking only
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Small cap. Limited venue coverage. Check the order book before assuming you can exit.

How the score breaks down

track record18/20
tokenomics18/20
transparency15/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption6/15
liquidity6/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. Holders can stake to earn rewards, though much of that reward is newly issued rather than earned revenue.

Holding VET generates VTHO over time, and VTHO pays transaction fees. This insulates enterprise users from fee token price volatility, which is a sensible design for corporate adoption.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Has operated for around 8 years and through at least one full bear market
  • Supply is capped, so holders are not diluted indefinitely
  • Audited, with published reports
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
✗ Weaknesses
  • Heavily concentrated ownership means a few wallets control the outcome
  • Upgrade control sits with a small group, so the rules can change
  • Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit

Incident history

No major exploit, collapse or regulatory action on record against this asset.

Our read

The dual token design genuinely solves a real problem for enterprises, who cannot budget against a volatile gas token. It has verifiable corporate partnerships around product tracking and carbon reporting. The trade off is explicit: consensus is proof of authority, with a permissioned validator set chosen by the foundation, so it is a corporate chain rather than a decentralised one.

The main risk

Permissioned proof of authority validators selected by the foundation, so decentralisation is limited by design.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.