BARRON
SolanaBorrows the ticker of a member of the Trump family. There is no connection between the two.
Every token whose trading pool opened in the last 7 days across 19 chains, filtered down to those with genuine liquidity and real trading. We seal the list, then re-check every token on it week after week and publish what became of them. No prices, no 24 hour change, nothing that is stale by the time you read it.
What this list is not. It is not a set of picks, and appearing here is not a quality signal. It shows tokens that launched recently and were actually traded. It cannot tell you whether the liquidity is locked, whether the developer can still mint supply, or who holds it, and those are the things that decide whether you get rugged. We hold none of these and there are no affiliate links.
A recognisable ticker is the cheapest marketing there is. None of these tokens is connected to, endorsed by, or gives you any claim on the thing it is named after.
This is the part a screener will not show you. A screener lists what is trading right now, so anything that died has already vanished from it and the failures are invisible. We seal each week's list and keep re-checking it against the same $10,000 liquidity floor every token had to clear to get on it. Nothing is removed for failing.
Ranked on traction relative to size at the moment the record was sealed. Depth and activity are shown as bands rather than figures on purpose: the exact numbers move constantly, the band is what changes a decision, and a band is still true a week later.
Borrows the ticker of a member of the Trump family. There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of MicroStrategy (Nasdaq: MSTR). There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of Truth Social. There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of OpenAI. There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL). There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD). There is no connection between the two.
Borrows the ticker of Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD). There is no connection between the two.
Where they launched: Solana 23, Base 9, BNB Chain 3, Arbitrum 2, TRON 1, Ethereum 1.
All four are free, take about five minutes in total, and cover the ways money is actually taken in this category. Market data cannot answer any of them.
Our rug pull module walks through each one, and the rug pull risk checker turns them into a score. For tokens that have been around long enough to actually assess, the new memecoins page scores every recent launch we have reviewed.
Every week an automated scan reads the public pool data for 19 chains, keeps only tokens whose trading pool was created within the last 7 days, and discards anything below a floor of $10,000 liquidity, $15,000 of 24 hour volume and 100 trades. Established assets that merely opened a new pool are removed, because a fresh USDT pool is not a new token.
Because all three are wrong within minutes of being published, and this page refreshes weekly. Showing a number that is stale by the time you read it is worse than showing nothing, because it invites a decision based on something untrue. Everything here is either structural, such as which chain a token launched on, or historical, such as what happened to it afterwards. Both stay true. For a live price, use an exchange or a DEX screener, which is what those are for.
No, and it is important to be blunt about that. This list shows what launched and got traded. It says nothing about whether the liquidity is locked, whether the developer can mint more supply, or who holds it. Those are the things that decide whether you can be rugged, and none of them are visible in market data. Run the four checks before touching anything here.
From next week this page answers that with real numbers rather than a guess. Every token listed is re-checked on every later scan against the same liquidity floor it had to clear to be listed, and the result is published whether it flatters the list or not. The first re-check is due seven days after the first cohort was sealed.
Because price change on a two day old token is mostly a function of how thin the book is. A token can be up several hundred percent on a few thousand dollars of buying, and that same thinness means you cannot get out at the quoted price. Liquidity, real trade counts and the balance between buys and sells are harder to fake and tell you more.
Because a familiar ticker does the marketing for free. A token called MSTR or AAPL has no connection to the company, gives you no claim on it and is not endorsed by it. The name is the product. Any launch leaning on a recognisable name deserves more scepticism than an obviously invented one, not less.
Because launching there costs a fraction of a cent and takes seconds, so that is where the volume of launches is. It is not a quality signal in either direction. Ethereum has fewer new tokens largely because gas makes both launching and small trades expensive.