HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › SUB

Substratum (SUB): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A 2017 project promising a decentralised web that would bypass censorship, which was charged by the SEC over its token sale and never delivered a working product.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Substratum is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the SUB token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Ethereum. Mechanism: Decentralised web hosting network. It has been running since 2017, so roughly 9 years.

The facts

TICKER
SUB
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Ethereum
LAUNCHED
2017, so around 9 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Decentralised web hosting network
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Approximately 600 million
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. The project never delivered a working product and is dead.
✗ Weaknesses
  • The SEC charged its founder over an unregistered offering and misuse of proceeds
  • The promised decentralised web never functioned meaningfully
  • No development or operation remains
  • Representative of the 2017 cohort that raised heavily and delivered nothing

Incident history

2021

The SEC charged its founder with conducting an unregistered securities offering and misappropriating proceeds for personal expenses.

Our read

Recorded as a representative case from the 2017 cohort. The SEC charged its founder in 2021 with conducting an unregistered securities offering and with misusing proceeds for personal spending. The promised network never functioned meaningfully and the project is dead.

The main risk

The project is dead and its founder faced SEC charges over the token sale.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.