HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › LUNC

Terra Luna Classic (LUNC): tokenomics, risks and score

26/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

The original Terra chain token, left behind after the 2022 collapse and kept running by a residual community attempting to burn its way out of a supply of several trillion tokens.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What Terra Luna Classic is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the LUNC token itself does: A transaction tax burns a portion of every transfer. The supply is so large that the burn rate is negligible against it.

Where it runs: Terra Classic. Mechanism: Tendermint proof of stake. It has been running since 2019, so roughly 7 years.

The facts

TICKER
LUNC
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Terra Classic
LAUNCHED
2019, so around 7 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Tendermint proof of stake
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Approximately 6.9 trillion after hyperinflation
VALUE CAPTURE
Buyback burn
UPGRADE CONTROL
DAO governed
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation6/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

Supply expands and contracts by design rather than following a fixed schedule. Fees are used to buy and destroy supply, so usage reduces the number of tokens outstanding.

A transaction tax burns a portion of every transfer. The supply is so large that the burn rate is negligible against it.

Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • The chain still operates and is maintained by a residual community
✗ Weaknesses
  • Supply inflated from roughly 350 million to over six trillion tokens in 2022
  • The burn rate is negligible against the outstanding supply
  • No meaningful ecosystem or development remains
  • Associated with the largest collapse in the sector's history

Incident history

No major exploit, collapse or regulatory action on record against this asset.

Our read

Listed honestly rather than removed. The chain still operates and a community still maintains it, but the token supply expanded from roughly 350 million to over six trillion during the collapse. Recovering any meaningful price from that supply would require burning a proportion of tokens that the current burn rate cannot approach within any realistic timeframe.

The main risk

Supply expanded to trillions during the 2022 collapse. The burn mechanism is orders of magnitude too small to reverse it.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.