HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › SQUID

Squid Game Token (SQUID): tokenomics, risks and score

19/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A 2021 token that used an unauthorised television brand and contained code preventing most holders from ever selling. Its creators withdrew the liquidity and disappeared.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Squid Game Token is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the SQUID token itself does: The contract included an anti dumping mechanism that in practice blocked ordinary holders from selling at all, while the deployers retained the ability to remove liquidity.

Where it runs: BNB Chain. Mechanism: BEP-20 token with a transfer restriction. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
SQUID
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
BNB Chain
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
BEP-20 token with a transfer restriction
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not meaningfully documented
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Single key
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency2/15
decentralisation3/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The contract included an anti dumping mechanism that in practice blocked ordinary holders from selling at all, while the deployers retained the ability to remove liquidity.

A single key controls the contract. Whoever holds it can change the rules or move funds. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. This was a honeypot scam.
✗ Weaknesses
  • The contract prevented ordinary holders from selling
  • Anonymous creators removed liquidity and disappeared
  • Used a major television brand without any authorisation
  • Every red flag was publicly visible in the contract before the collapse

Incident history

2021

The creators removed all liquidity and disappeared with roughly 3.3 million dollars. The price fell to effectively zero within minutes while most holders had been unable to sell at any point.

Our read

The textbook honeypot, recorded here as a teaching example. The token rose enormously while buyers were unable to exit, then the creators removed the liquidity and the price went to zero within minutes. Every warning sign was visible before it happened: an unverified contract, an anonymous team, a borrowed brand and a sell restriction in the code that anyone could have read.

The main risk

This was an outright scam. It is recorded so people searching the name find the truth.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.