HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › QBT

Qubit Finance (QBT): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A BNB Chain lending protocol whose bridge was exploited for roughly eighty million dollars in 2022, after which it ceased operating.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Qubit Finance is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the QBT token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: BNB Chain. Mechanism: Lending protocol with a cross chain bridge. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
QBT
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
BNB Chain
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Lending protocol with a cross chain bridge
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not meaningfully documented
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. The protocol was drained and ceased operating.
✗ Weaknesses
  • A basic logic error allowed collateral to be minted without deposits
  • Roughly eighty million dollars was drained
  • The protocol did not recover and ceased operating
  • Illustrates that audited code can still contain elementary errors

Incident history

2022

A logic error allowed an attacker to register collateral without depositing, then borrow against it repeatedly, draining roughly eighty million dollars.

Our read

Recorded because the flaw was elementary. A logic error in the bridge allowed an attacker to mint collateral without depositing anything, then borrow against it until the protocol was empty. The exploit required no sophistication, only reading the contract carefully, and the protocol did not recover.

The main risk

Exploited through an elementary logic error and ceased operating. There is nothing here.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.