HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › PRISMA

Prisma Finance (PRISMA): tokenomics, risks and score

26/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A protocol issuing a stablecoin against liquid staking tokens, which was exploited in 2024 and subsequently wound down.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What Prisma Finance is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the PRISMA token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.

Where it runs: Ethereum. Mechanism: Liquid staking backed stablecoin. It has been running since 2023, so roughly 3 years.

The facts

TICKER
PRISMA
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Ethereum
LAUNCHED
2023, so around 3 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Liquid staking backed stablecoin
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
300 million
VALUE CAPTURE
Fee share
UPGRADE CONTROL
DAO governed
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation6/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.

Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • A portion of exploited funds was returned after negotiation with the attacker
✗ Weaknesses
  • Exploited for roughly eleven million dollars through a migration contract flaw
  • Deposits never recovered after the incident
  • The protocol has wound down
  • Illustrates how rarely a protocol recovers from a significant exploit

Incident history

2024

A flaw in a migration contract was exploited for roughly eleven million dollars. A portion was returned after negotiation, but deposits never recovered and the protocol wound down.

Our read

Recorded because the failure is instructive. A flaw in its migration contract was exploited for roughly eleven million dollars in March 2024, after which the protocol paused, negotiated a partial return with the attacker, and never regained meaningful deposits before winding down. Recovery from an exploit is rare.

The main risk

Exploited in 2024 and subsequently wound down. Treat any position as residual.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.