HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › POLY-N

Poly Network (POLY-N): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A cross chain protocol that suffered what was then the largest crypto theft ever, roughly 610 million dollars in 2021, almost all of which was returned.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What Poly Network is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the POLY-N token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Multi chain. Mechanism: Cross chain interoperability protocol. It has been running since 2020, so roughly 6 years.

The facts

TICKER
POLY-N
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Multi chain
LAUNCHED
2020, so around 6 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Cross chain interoperability protocol
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not meaningfully documented
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

No fixed cap. Supply policy is set by governance and can change. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • The 2021 attacker returned essentially all of the stolen funds, which is almost unprecedented
✗ Weaknesses
  • Suffered what was then the largest crypto theft at roughly 610 million dollars
  • Exploited a second time in 2023 through a compromised key
  • Activity ceased after the second incident
  • Illustrates that a bridge can be exploited repeatedly through different vectors

Incident history

2021

Exploited for roughly 610 million dollars, the largest crypto theft at the time. The attacker returned essentially all of the funds.

2023

Exploited again through a compromised key, minting large quantities of tokens across several chains. Activity ceased afterwards.

Our read

Recorded because the ending was extraordinary. The attacker exploited a contract flaw to take roughly 610 million dollars, then returned essentially all of it, stating they had done it to expose the vulnerability. It was exploited again in 2023 for a smaller sum through a compromised key, after which activity ceased.

The main risk

Exploited twice, with activity ceasing after the second incident. Treat as wound down.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.