HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › PTP

Platypus Finance (PTP): tokenomics, risks and score

26/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

An Avalanche stablecoin exchange exploited three separate times in 2023, after which it wound down.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What Platypus Finance is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the PTP token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.

Where it runs: Avalanche. Mechanism: Single sided stablecoin AMM. It has been running since 2022, so roughly 4 years.

The facts

TICKER
PTP
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Avalanche
LAUNCHED
2022, so around 4 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Single sided stablecoin AMM
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
300 million
VALUE CAPTURE
Fee share
UPGRADE CONTROL
DAO governed
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation6/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.

Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • One attacker was arrested, which is unusual and a mild deterrent for the sector
✗ Weaknesses
  • Exploited three separate times within a single year
  • A flawed solvency check allowed the first attack
  • The protocol wound down after the repeated incidents
  • Three exploits in a year is a definitive signal about engineering process

Incident history

2023

A flawed solvency check was exploited for roughly nine million dollars. The attacker was subsequently arrested in France.

2023

Two further exploits followed within months on related contracts, after which the protocol wound down.

Our read

Recorded because three exploits in one year is close to a record. The first exploited a flawed solvency check, and further incidents followed on related contracts. In an unusual twist, the first attacker was arrested in France. Repeated exploitation at one protocol is the clearest possible signal about its engineering process.

The main risk

Exploited three times in one year and wound down. There is nothing operating.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.