HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › ONECOIN

OneCoin (ONECOIN): tokenomics, risks and score

23/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A multi level marketing scheme that raised over four billion dollars while never operating a blockchain at all, and whose founder disappeared in 2017.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What OneCoin is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the ONECOIN token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: No public blockchain existed. Mechanism: None. There was no blockchain. It has been running since 2014, so roughly 12 years.

The facts

TICKER
ONECOIN
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
No public blockchain existed
LAUNCHED
2014, so around 12 years of operating history
MECHANISM
None. There was no blockchain
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Never verifiable. No genuine blockchain was ever operated
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Single key
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation3/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

No fixed cap. Supply policy is set by governance and can change. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

A single key controls the contract. Whoever holds it can change the rules or move funds. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. This was a fraud with no blockchain behind it.
✗ Weaknesses
  • No blockchain ever existed. Balances were entries in a private database
  • Raised over four billion dollars from investors worldwide
  • The co-founder was convicted and sentenced to twenty years
  • The founder disappeared in 2017 and remains on international wanted lists

Incident history

2017

The founder disappeared and remains on international wanted lists.

2019 to 2023

The co-founder pleaded guilty in the United States and was sentenced to twenty years. Investigators confirmed no blockchain ever existed and that balances were database entries.

Our read

Recorded so that anyone searching finds the truth. Investigators established there was no blockchain: the balances shown to investors were entries in an ordinary database. Its co-founder was convicted and sentenced in the United States, and its founder remains missing and on international wanted lists. It is the largest crypto fraud by amount raised.

The main risk

This was a fraud. There was never a blockchain and there is nothing to buy.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.