HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › MULTI

Multichain (MULTI): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

Once the largest cross chain bridge, which collapsed in 2023 after roughly 130 million dollars was moved out of its contracts following the disappearance of its chief executive.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Multichain is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the MULTI token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.

Where it runs: Multi chain. Mechanism: Cross chain router with custodial nodes. It has been running since 2020, so roughly 6 years.

The facts

TICKER
MULTI
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Multi chain
LAUNCHED
2020, so around 6 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Cross chain router with custodial nodes
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
100 million
VALUE CAPTURE
Fee share
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. The protocol collapsed in 2023 and no longer operates.
✗ Weaknesses
  • Roughly 130 million dollars left the protocol after its chief executive was detained
  • Operational keys were controlled by a single individual, which was not publicly known
  • Users across many chains were unable to recover bridged assets
  • The protocol shut down entirely

Incident history

2023

Roughly 130 million dollars moved out of the protocol's contracts after its chief executive was reportedly detained while holding sole control of operational keys. The team announced it could not continue and the protocol shut down.

Our read

Recorded because it is the most important bridge failure to understand. Its chief executive was reportedly detained by Chinese authorities holding sole control of the operational keys, after which funds moved out of the protocol and the team announced it could not continue. Key control sat with one individual, which nobody outside knew.

The main risk

The protocol collapsed after single person key control failed. There is nothing operating.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.