HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › HND

Hundred Finance (HND): tokenomics, risks and score

26/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A lending protocol exploited twice, the second time for roughly seven million dollars through a rounding error in an empty market.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Hundred Finance is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the HND token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.

Where it runs: Multi chain. Mechanism: Multi chain lending protocol. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
HND
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Multi chain
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Multi chain lending protocol
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not fully documented
VALUE CAPTURE
Fee share
UPGRADE CONTROL
DAO governed
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation6/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.

Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. The protocol was exploited twice and ceased operating.
✗ Weaknesses
  • Exploited twice through different vectors
  • A rounding manipulation in a near empty market enabled the second attack
  • The protocol ceased operating afterwards
  • Empty lending markets remain a recurring and underappreciated attack surface

Incident history

2022

A reentrancy attack on a bridged asset drained several million dollars.

2023

A rounding manipulation in an empty market drained roughly seven million dollars, after which the protocol ceased operating.

Our read

Recorded because the second exploit is a specific and recurring pattern. When a lending market has almost no liquidity, rounding in the exchange rate calculation can be manipulated by donating a tiny amount, letting an attacker borrow far more than they should. Empty markets are dangerous precisely because they look harmless.

The main risk

Exploited twice and ceased operating. Empty lending markets remain a recurring attack surface.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.