HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › EMAX

EthereumMax (EMAX): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A 2021 token with no connection to Ethereum despite the name, promoted by high profile celebrities and the subject of a US regulatory penalty over undisclosed payment.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What EthereumMax is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the EMAX token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Ethereum. Mechanism: ERC-20 with a transaction tax. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
EMAX
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Ethereum
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
ERC-20 with a transaction tax
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Approximately 2 quadrillion
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. It fell over ninety nine percent and led to an SEC enforcement action.
✗ Weaknesses
  • The name implies a connection to Ethereum that does not exist
  • Fell over ninety nine percent from its promotional peak
  • A celebrity promoter was fined for not disclosing payment
  • A transaction tax made exiting more expensive

Incident history

2021

Fell over ninety nine percent within months of its promotional peak.

2022

A celebrity promoter was fined by the SEC for failing to disclose payment received for promoting the token, a landmark case for paid crypto promotion.

Our read

Recorded because the enforcement action set a precedent. A celebrity was fined by the SEC for promoting it without disclosing they had been paid, which established that paid crypto promotion must be disclosed. The name implies a relationship to Ethereum that does not exist. It fell over ninety nine percent.

The main risk

Fell over ninety nine percent, and its promotion led to a landmark SEC enforcement action.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.