HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › BALD

Bald (BALD): tokenomics, risks and score

19/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

The first major Base memecoin, which collapsed within days when its deployer withdrew the liquidity they had provided.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Bald is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the BALD token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Base. Mechanism: ERC-20 token on Base. It has been running since 2023, so roughly 3 years.

The facts

TICKER
BALD
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
Base
LAUNCHED
2023, so around 3 years of operating history
MECHANISM
ERC-20 token on Base
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not consistently documented
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Single key
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency2/15
decentralisation3/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

A single key controls the contract. Whoever holds it can change the rules or move funds. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • None. Liquidity was removed by the deployer and the token collapsed.
✗ Weaknesses
  • The deployer supplied and then removed the liquidity
  • Holders were left unable to sell at any meaningful price
  • Liquidity was never burned or locked, which was checkable before buying
  • The first major cautionary case on Base

Incident history

2023

The deployer removed the liquidity they had supplied, collapsing the price within minutes and leaving holders unable to sell at any meaningful price.

Our read

Recorded as the defining early Base cautionary case. The deployer supplied the liquidity themselves and then removed it, which is legal within the mechanics of an AMM and destroys the price instantly. Liquidity that has not been burned or locked can always be pulled, and checking that is a two minute job.

The main risk

The deployer removed liquidity and the token collapsed. Unlocked liquidity can always be pulled.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.