HomeCryptoTokensFailed and defunct › ABNBC

Ankr aBNBc (ABNBC): tokenomics, risks and score

25/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A liquid staking token whose supply was inflated to trillions in 2022 when a former employee used retained keys to mint without limit.

This project failed. This page exists so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material.

What Ankr aBNBc is, and what it does

This asset has failed. It is recorded here so that a search returns what actually happened rather than promotional material that is still online.

What the ABNBC token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: BNB Chain. Mechanism: Liquid staking derivative. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
ABNBC
SECTOR
Failed and defunct
CHAIN
BNB Chain
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Liquid staking derivative
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Was minted against staked BNB
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record5/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

Supply expands and contracts by design rather than following a fixed schedule. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • The issuer compensated affected users and rebuilt its key management afterwards
✗ Weaknesses
  • A former employee retained deployer keys and minted without limit
  • The peg was destroyed within minutes
  • No contract flaw was involved. The failure was entirely internal controls
  • Demonstrates that offboarding and key rotation are security controls

Incident history

2022

A former employee used retained deployer keys to mint an unlimited quantity of the token, destroying its peg. The issuer compensated affected users and rebuilt its key management.

Our read

Recorded because the failure was internal rather than technical. A departed employee retained deployer keys and used them to mint an unlimited quantity, destroying the peg within minutes. No contract was hacked and no clever exploit was needed. Offboarding and key rotation are security controls, and their absence was the vulnerability.

The main risk

The token was destroyed by an internal key management failure. It no longer functions.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.