Balancer: score, security record and what it is for
Balancer pioneered weighted pools, letting a pool hold assets in any ratio rather than fifty fifty. On 3 November 2025 attackers exploited a rounding direction error in v2 Composable Stable Pools and drained over 100 million dollars across nine chains, compounding thousands of tiny discrepancies into a very large loss. The contracts had been audited repeatedly. Balancer v3 uses different logic and was not affected, but several v2 forks were.
The facts
- LIVE SINCE
- 2020
- TYPE
- AMM, weighted pools
- CHAINS
- Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Base and more
- SWAP FEE
- Set per pool by the pool creator.
- AUDITS
- Audited repeatedly, which did not prevent the November 2025 exploit.
- WHO CAN CHANGE IT
- veBAL vote escrowed governance.
How the score breaks down
Where it is strong and where it is not
- Weighted pools allow structures no other AMM offers
- v3 was not affected by the 2025 exploit
- Genuinely decentralised governance
- Lost over 100 million dollars in November 2025 from repeatedly audited contracts
- The affected v2 design is still widely forked elsewhere
- Liquidity has not recovered to previous levels
Exploit history
Over 100 million dollars, reported between 110 and 128 million, was drained from Balancer v2 Composable Stable Pools across nine chains on 3 November. The cause was a rounding direction error exploited through thousands of tiny transactions that compounded. Balancer v3 was not affected, and several forks of v2 were.
