Home / Crypto / Academy / Risk and portfolio

Hedging, and the cheaper alternatives most people should use instead

Hedging is presented as sophisticated. For most people most of the time, selling is cheaper, simpler and works better.

MODULE 52 OF 64 LEVEL 6: RISK AND PORTFOLIO 12 MIN

What a hedge is and what it costs

A hedge is a second position that gains when your main position loses. It does not remove risk, it converts market risk into a known cost plus a set of new risks. That trade is sometimes worth making and it is never free.

The costs people forget

The direct cost

Premium or funding

An option costs a premium whether or not you need it. A short pays or receives funding continuously. In a rising market a hedge bleeds money every day.

The upside you give up

Often the largest cost

A perfect hedge means you make nothing when the market rises. People hedge at lows, unwind at highs, and capture the worst of both.

New counterparty risk

Venue and protocol

The hedge lives somewhere. That venue can fail, restrict withdrawals, or liquidate you on a wick. You have added an operational risk to reduce a price risk.

Basis risk

Imperfect matching

Hedging an altcoin portfolio with a Bitcoin short works until your altcoins fall while Bitcoin does not. Then you lose on both sides simultaneously.

Complexity cost

Real and underrated

Two positions to monitor, margin to maintain, liquidation levels to track. Most retail hedges fail through mismanagement rather than through being the wrong idea.

The question that resolves most cases

If you are worried enough about the downside to pay for protection, ask why you are holding the position at that size. Reducing to a size you are comfortable with achieves the same reduction in risk, costs nothing but transaction fees, adds no counterparty, and requires no monitoring.

For the overwhelming majority of retail portfolios, "sell some" outperforms "hedge" on every dimension except how it sounds.

When hedging is genuinely the better answer

Selling would trigger a tax event you cannot accept. A large unrealised gain with a holding period that changes the rate materially is a real reason.
You cannot sell. Locked staking, a vesting schedule, an illiquid position, or a defined lock up period.
You want the asset for a non price reason. Governance participation, staking rewards, or a required collateral position.
A specific dated event. A known unlock, a regulatory decision, a launch. A short dated hedge around a known date is a defined and reasonable trade.
Your position is large enough that selling moves the market against you. This applies to very few individuals and is the classic institutional case.

The instruments, briefly and honestly

How each behaves in practice

Sell part of the position

Best default

No cost beyond fees, no counterparty, no monitoring, no liquidation. Underrated because it is not clever.

Rotate into stablecoins

The same thing, framed better

Identical to selling and psychologically easier because you stay in the asset class. Carries stablecoin issuer risk, which is small but real.

Short perpetual futures

Effective and dangerous

Precise and liquid. You pay or receive funding, and you can be liquidated by a move that later reverses, leaving you with neither the hedge nor the capital. Requires active margin management.

Buy put options

Defined risk, real cost

The maximum loss is the premium and you keep all the upside. Genuinely the right tool for a dated event. Crypto options liquidity is concentrated in a few venues and premiums are expensive because volatility is high.

Delta neutral positioning

Institutional

Holding spot while shorting an equivalent perpetual to earn funding. A real strategy with real returns, and it demands constant management and carries venue risk on both legs.

A hedge you cannot maintain is worse than no hedge. Liquidation on a short during a volatile spike removes the protection at the precise moment it was needed, and you still hold the falling asset. If you cannot monitor margin daily, do not hold a leveraged hedge.

Cash is a position

The most reliable hedge available to an individual is holding less. Cash and stablecoins are uncorrelated with the sector, cost nothing to maintain, cannot be liquidated, and give you the ability to buy when everything is discounted.

Professionals describe cash as optionality and price it accordingly. Retail investors describe it as being out of the market and feel bad about it. The difference in framing produces a large difference in outcomes over a full cycle.

BEFORE YOU MOVE ON

I know a hedge converts risk rather than removing it I can list the five costs of hedging including forgone upside I ask whether reducing size achieves the same thing more cheaply I can name the situations where hedging is genuinely correct I understand that a liquidated hedge is worse than no hedge I treat cash as a position with value, not as being sidelined

Common questions

Should I hedge my crypto or just sell?

For most retail portfolios, selling part of the position is better on every dimension: no premium, no counterparty, no liquidation risk, no monitoring. Hedging makes sense mainly when you cannot sell, when tax makes selling expensive, or around a specific dated event.

What is the cheapest way to hedge crypto?

Reducing the position. Beyond that, rotating into stablecoins is functionally identical to selling. Shorts and puts both carry ongoing costs and add counterparty risk.

Is holding stablecoins the same as being out of the market?

Economically yes, and it is a position rather than an absence of one. Cash provides the ability to buy during a crash, which is where a large share of full cycle returns is actually made.

Risk warning: crypto is highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing here is financial, investment or tax advice.

← PREVIOUS

Building a portfolio: tiers, allocations and rebalancing

Psychology: the specific ways your mind will cost you money