HomeCryptoTokensLayer 2 and scaling › ZRC

Zircuit (ZRC): tokenomics, risks and score

38/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A zero knowledge rollup that screens transactions at the sequencer for malicious behaviour before including them, aiming to prevent exploits rather than react to them.

What Zircuit is, and what it does

This is a scaling layer. It processes transactions away from a base chain and periodically settles back to it, so transactions cost far less while still relying on the base chain for security.

What the ZRC token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Zircuit. Mechanism: zk rollup with sequencer level transaction screening. It has been running since 2024, so roughly 2 years.

The facts

TICKER
ZRC
SECTOR
Layer 2 and scaling
CHAIN
Zircuit
LAUNCHED
2024, so around 2 years of operating history
MECHANISM
zk rollup with sequencer level transaction screening
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
10 billion
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Heavy overhang
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record7/20
tokenomics7/20
transparency15/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Supply is capped, so holders are not diluted indefinitely
  • Audited, with published reports
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
✗ Weaknesses
  • Heavily concentrated ownership means a few wallets control the outcome
  • The token captures no protocol revenue, so its value rests on sentiment
  • Significant supply is still scheduled to unlock, which is a structural headwind
  • Upgrade control sits with a small group, so the rules can change

Incident history

No major exploit, collapse or regulatory action on record against this asset.

Our read

Sequencer level screening is a genuinely novel security idea and could prevent some categories of attack. It is also a form of censorship at the protocol level, which many consider incompatible with the point of a permissionless chain. Activity is low and unlocks are heavy.

The main risk

Transaction screening is censorship by another name, activity is low, and unlocks are heavy.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.