Unibot (UNIBOT): tokenomics, risks and score
One of the first Telegram trading bots to share revenue with token holders, which suffered a contract exploit in 2023.
What Unibot is, and what it does
This is a DeFi protocol. It provides a financial service such as trading, lending or derivatives through smart contracts rather than through a company, so there is no account to open and no one to approve you.
What the UNIBOT token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.
Where it runs: Ethereum. Mechanism: Telegram trading bot with revenue share. It has been running since 2023, so roughly 3 years.
The facts
- TICKER
- UNIBOT
- SECTOR
- DeFi
- CHAIN
- Ethereum
- LAUNCHED
- 2023, so around 3 years of operating history
- MECHANISM
- Telegram trading bot with revenue share
- MAXIMUM SUPPLY
- 1 million
- VALUE CAPTURE
- Fee share
- UPGRADE CONTROL
- Team controlled
- VESTING
- Complete
- LIQUIDITY BAND
- Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.
How the score breaks down
Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.
Supply and value capture
A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.
The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.
Where it is strong and where it is not
- Supply is capped, so holders are not diluted indefinitely
- The token captures real protocol revenue rather than relying on speculation alone
- Vesting is complete, so there is no scheduled supply overhang
- Heavily concentrated ownership means a few wallets control the outcome
- Upgrade control sits with a small group, so the rules can change
- Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit
- Has 1 recorded incident on its history
Incident history
A flaw in its router contract was exploited, draining tokens from users who had granted it approvals. The team compensated affected users.
Our read
The main risk
A prior approval based exploit, closed source code, a pseudonymous team and declining market share.
Before you buy anything
Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.