HomeCryptoTokensGaming and metaverse › SLP

Smooth Love Potion (SLP): tokenomics, risks and score

49/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

The in game reward currency of Axie Infinity, minted by players through gameplay and the clearest example of what happens when a game currency has unlimited supply.

What Smooth Love Potion is, and what it does

This is a gaming or metaverse asset. It exists inside a game or virtual world, where it is used to buy, earn or govern things within that product.

What the SLP token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Ronin. Mechanism: In game reward token. It has been running since 2020, so roughly 6 years.

The facts

TICKER
SLP
SECTOR
Gaming and metaverse
CHAIN
Ronin
LAUNCHED
2020, so around 6 years of operating history
MECHANISM
In game reward token
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
No hard cap, minted through gameplay
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record14/20
tokenomics8/20
transparency15/15
decentralisation8/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

High ongoing issuance. New tokens are minted continuously and holders are diluted unless they participate. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is moderately concentrated. A handful of large holders could move the market.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Has operated for around 6 years and through at least one full bear market
  • Audited, with published reports
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
  • Vesting is complete, so there is no scheduled supply overhang
✗ Weaknesses
  • Unlimited supply minted continuously through gameplay
  • Demand depended entirely on new player growth, which stopped
  • Fell more than ninety nine percent from its peak
  • The economic design had no mechanism to balance supply against demand

Incident history

No major exploit, collapse or regulatory action on record against this asset.

Our read

Recorded as a teaching case. Players minted it through play with no cap, and its only demand came from new players needing it to breed. When new player growth stopped, supply continued and demand vanished, and the price fell over ninety nine percent. It is the definitive illustration of why play to earn economies fail.

The main risk

Unlimited supply minted by players against demand that collapsed. It fell over ninety nine percent from its peak.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.