HomeCryptoTokensStablecoins › RSUP

Resupply (RSUP): tokenomics, risks and score

23/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A stablecoin protocol backed by receipts from other lending markets, which was exploited in June 2025 shortly after launch.

This project is effectively finished. It still trades, and there is no meaningful development or ecosystem behind it.

What Resupply is, and what it does

This is a stablecoin. It is designed to hold a fixed value, almost always one US dollar, so it can be used for payments and trading without the price moving underneath you.

What the RSUP token itself does: It receives a share of the fees the protocol collects, so holding it is a claim on real revenue.

Where it runs: Ethereum. Mechanism: Stablecoin backed by lending receipts. It has been running since 2025, so roughly 1 years.

The facts

TICKER
RSUP
SECTOR
Stablecoins
CHAIN
Ethereum
LAUNCHED
2025, so around 1 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Stablecoin backed by lending receipts
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Not fully documented
VALUE CAPTURE
Fee share
UPGRADE CONTROL
Multisig
VESTING
Not published
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record2/20
tokenomics5/20
transparency6/15
decentralisation6/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. A share of protocol fees reaches holders directly, which is the strongest form of value capture available.

A multisignature wallet controls upgrades. Better than one key and still a small group of people. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • The failure is a clear teaching case about depending on another protocol's pricing
✗ Weaknesses
  • Exploited within months of launch for roughly ten million dollars
  • Depended on another protocol's exchange rate as collateral pricing
  • Pseudonymous team with incomplete supply documentation
  • The protocol did not recover from the incident

Incident history

2025

An attacker manipulated the exchange rate of a lending receipt used as collateral, minting roughly ten million dollars of stablecoin against negligible backing.

Our read

Recorded because the failure is a textbook composability cascade. An attacker manipulated the exchange rate of a lending receipt used as collateral, minting roughly ten million dollars of the stablecoin against almost nothing. The protocol depended on another protocol's pricing, which is exactly the layered risk the Academy warns about.

The main risk

Exploited within months of launch through a dependency on another protocol's pricing. Treat as residual.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.