HomeCryptoTokensInfrastructure › ONG

Ontology Gas (ONG): tokenomics, risks and score

53/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

The fee token of the Ontology network, generated over time by holders of the main network token in a two token design.

What Ontology Gas is, and what it does

This is infrastructure. Other applications depend on it for something they cannot easily do themselves, such as price data, indexing, storage or identity.

What the ONG token itself does: It captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, on speculation, or on a change that has not happened yet.

Where it runs: Ontology. Mechanism: Fee token generated by holding ONT. It has been running since 2018, so roughly 8 years.

The facts

TICKER
ONG
SECTOR
Infrastructure
CHAIN
Ontology
LAUNCHED
2018, so around 8 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Fee token generated by holding ONT
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
1 billion
VALUE CAPTURE
None
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
In progress
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record18/20
tokenomics11/20
transparency15/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. The token captures no protocol revenue. Any value rests on governance rights, speculation, or future changes that have not happened yet.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Has operated for around 8 years and through at least one full bear market
  • Supply is capped, so holders are not diluted indefinitely
  • Audited, with published reports
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
✗ Weaknesses
  • Heavily concentrated ownership means a few wallets control the outcome
  • The token captures no protocol revenue, so its value rests on sentiment
  • Upgrade control sits with a small group, so the rules can change
  • Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit

Incident history

No major exploit, collapse or regulatory action on record against this asset.

Our read

The two token design insulates users from fee token volatility, which is sensible for enterprise adoption, and it distributes fee tokens to holders passively. Its value depends entirely on network activity, which has been negligible for years, so the generated tokens have very little demand behind them.

The main risk

Its value depends on network activity that has been negligible for years.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.