Meter (MTRG): tokenomics, risks and score
A chain with a two token model where a proof of work mined token acts as a metastable currency pegged loosely to the cost of electricity used to mine it.
What Meter is, and what it does
This is a base blockchain. It runs and secures its own network, and its token is what you pay to use that network and what secures it.
What the MTRG token itself does: It can be staked to earn rewards, though a large part of those rewards is newly issued token rather than earned revenue.
Where it runs: Meter. Mechanism: Hybrid proof of work and proof of stake with a metastable currency. It has been running since 2020, so roughly 6 years.
The facts
- TICKER
- MTRG
- SECTOR
- Layer 1
- CHAIN
- Meter
- LAUNCHED
- 2020, so around 6 years of operating history
- MECHANISM
- Hybrid proof of work and proof of stake with a metastable currency
- MAXIMUM SUPPLY
- No hard cap with staking issuance
- VALUE CAPTURE
- Staking only
- UPGRADE CONTROL
- DAO governed
- VESTING
- Complete
- LIQUIDITY BAND
- Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.
How the score breaks down
Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.
Supply and value capture
High ongoing issuance. New tokens are minted continuously and holders are diluted unless they participate. Holders can stake to earn rewards, though much of that reward is newly issued rather than earned revenue.
Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is moderately concentrated. A handful of large holders could move the market.
Where it is strong and where it is not
- Has operated for around 6 years and through at least one full bear market
- Audited, with published reports
- Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
- Vesting is complete, so there is no scheduled supply overhang
- High ongoing issuance dilutes holders who do not actively participate
- Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit
- Has 1 recorded incident on its history
Incident history
Its cross chain bridge was exploited for roughly four million dollars through a flaw in how it handled certain token transfers.
Our read
The main risk
A prior bridge exploit and a very small ecosystem despite an interesting monetary design.
Before you buy anything
Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.