HomeCryptoTokensReal world assets › OM

MANTRA (OM): tokenomics, risks and score

52/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A real world asset chain focused on the Middle East, holding a virtual asset licence in Dubai, whose token collapsed over ninety percent in a single day in April 2025.

What MANTRA is, and what it does

This is a real world asset. It represents something that exists outside the blockchain, such as government debt, property or a commodity, held by a custodian and recorded on chain.

What the OM token itself does: It can be staked to earn rewards, though a large part of those rewards is newly issued token rather than earned revenue.

Where it runs: MANTRA. Mechanism: Cosmos based chain for regulated real world assets. It has been running since 2020, so roughly 6 years.

The facts

TICKER
OM
SECTOR
Real world assets
CHAIN
MANTRA
LAUNCHED
2020, so around 6 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Cosmos based chain for regulated real world assets
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
1.77 billion
VALUE CAPTURE
Staking only
UPGRADE CONTROL
Team controlled
VESTING
In progress
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record11/20
tokenomics15/20
transparency15/15
decentralisation5/15
adoption3/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

A hard maximum supply that cannot be raised without the agreement of essentially every participant. Holders can stake to earn rewards, though much of that reward is newly issued rather than earned revenue.

The founding team retains control over upgrades or parameters. Ownership is heavily concentrated. A small number of wallets hold enough to determine the price on their own.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Has operated for around 6 years and through at least one full bear market
  • Supply is capped, so holders are not diluted indefinitely
  • Audited, with published reports
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
✗ Weaknesses
  • Heavily concentrated ownership means a few wallets control the outcome
  • Upgrade control sits with a small group, so the rules can change
  • Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit
  • Has 1 recorded incident on its history

Incident history

2025

The token fell more than ninety percent within hours in April, attributed to forced liquidation of large positions. Extreme supply concentration among insiders was widely identified as the underlying condition.

Our read

Recorded because the collapse is a defining recent example of concentration risk. The token fell more than ninety percent within hours on 13 April 2025, which the team attributed to forced liquidations of positions held by large holders on centralised venues. Analysis pointed to extreme supply concentration among insiders as the underlying condition that made it possible.

The main risk

Extreme supply concentration produced a ninety percent single day collapse, and unlocks continue.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.