HomeCryptoTokensStablecoins › BEAN

Beanstalk (BEAN): tokenomics, risks and score

49/100SCORE · DCaution Grade D, caution

A credit based algorithmic stablecoin that was drained of roughly 182 million dollars in 2022 through a governance attack rather than a code bug.

What Beanstalk is, and what it does

This is a stablecoin. It is designed to hold a fixed value, almost always one US dollar, so it can be used for payments and trading without the price moving underneath you.

What the BEAN token itself does: It can be staked to earn rewards, though a large part of those rewards is newly issued token rather than earned revenue.

Where it runs: Ethereum and Arbitrum. Mechanism: Credit based algorithmic stablecoin. It has been running since 2021, so roughly 5 years.

The facts

TICKER
BEAN
SECTOR
Stablecoins
CHAIN
Ethereum and Arbitrum
LAUNCHED
2021, so around 5 years of operating history
MECHANISM
Credit based algorithmic stablecoin
MAXIMUM SUPPLY
Supply expands and contracts to hold the peg
VALUE CAPTURE
Staking only
UPGRADE CONTROL
DAO governed
VESTING
Complete
LIQUIDITY BAND
Micro cap. Thin, often a single venue or pool. Treat the quoted price as indicative only.

How the score breaks down

track record10/20
tokenomics14/20
transparency10/15
decentralisation11/15
adoption1/15
liquidity3/15

Each dimension is explained on the directory page, and the reasoning behind it is taught in the Academy research process.

Supply and value capture

Supply expands and contracts by design rather than following a fixed schedule. Holders can stake to earn rewards, though much of that reward is newly issued rather than earned revenue.

Changes go through token holder governance, so control is distributed but influenced by whoever holds most. Ownership is moderately concentrated. A handful of large holders could move the market.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Fully open source, so the code can be independently reviewed
  • Vesting is complete, so there is no scheduled supply overhang
✗ Weaknesses
  • Thin liquidity. Check order book depth before assuming you can exit
  • Has 1 recorded incident on its history

Incident history

2022

An attacker used a flash loan to acquire a governance majority and pass a malicious proposal in a single transaction, draining roughly 182 million dollars. The governance system functioned exactly as designed.

Our read

Recorded because the attack vector was novel and remains relevant. The attacker used a flash loan to acquire enough governance tokens to pass their own malicious proposal instantly, then executed it in the same transaction. No code was broken: the governance process worked exactly as designed and was used to steal everything.

The main risk

A prior governance takeover via flash loan, and an algorithmic stablecoin design that has repeatedly failed elsewhere.

Before you buy anything

Check the contract address against the project's own documentation rather than a search result or a screener link, since impersonation tokens with identical names and logos are listed constantly. Check the order book depth before assuming you can exit at the quoted price. And write down what would make you wrong before you buy, not after. The Academy thesis module covers why that single habit protects more capital than any indicator.

COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.