HomeCryptoExchanges › Gate (Gate.io)

Gate (Gate.io) review: score, licensing and risks

70/100SCORE · BMixed record Grade B, very good

Gate lists more assets than almost any competitor and has published proof of reserves longer than most. That combination makes it a practical venue for early tokens. It holds no MiCA licence and does not serve the US.

The facts

FOUNDED
2013
HEADQUARTERS
Cayman Islands
CUSTODY
Custodial.
MiCA / EEA
Not authorised across the EEA at the time of writing.
US ACCESS
No.
PROOF OF RESERVES
Yes. Regular Merkle tree proof of reserves, and it was an early adopter.
FEES
Around 0.09 percent maker and taker at entry tier.
ASSETS
1,700 plus, one of the longest lists anywhere

How the score breaks down

regulation9/25
security16/25
costs15/15
assets15/15
platform9/10
support6/10

Each dimension is explained on the methodology page.

Where it is strong and where it is not

✓ Strengths
  • Enormous asset listing, including very early tokens
  • Early and consistent proof of reserves publisher
  • Cheap trading
  • Wide product range
✗ Weaknesses
  • No MiCA licence
  • No US access
  • Loose listing standards mean a long tail of poor quality tokens

Incident history

2018

A supply chain attack on a third party analytics script served malicious code to visitors. Gate detected and removed it.

Our read

A serious venue for reaching tokens nothing else lists, with a better proof of reserves record than most of its peers. The regulatory position is thin.
COMPARE
RISK WARNING Crypto assets are highly volatile and largely unregulated. You can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial, investment or tax advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Do your own research and never commit money you cannot afford to lose.